Vole Time

Pictured here is one of Penguin's favorite locals - a Vole. Or is it a rat? Ever since Rambo started the cliff erosion zone at the Hook, the Vole habitat has been threatened. Now hard to spot, the Vole is becoming as scarce as the Penguin. I think the Mayor needs to organize a protest to protect the Vole.

11 January 2009 – Beautiful day over the bay – warm offshore, wispy clouds, and a beautiful ocean. Flat.

12 January 2009 – more of the same – not bad, but waves are not part of the theme.

The Blood-Stained Monster Enters Gaza (reprinted without permission 01/11/09)
By Uri Avnery

Nearly seventy ago, in the course of World War II, a heinous crime was committed in the city of Leningrad. For more than a thousand days, a gang of extremists called “the Red Army” held the millions of the town’s inhabitants hostage and provoked retaliation from the German Wehrmacht from inside the population centers. The Germans had no alternative but to bomb and shell the population and to impose a total blockade, which caused the death of hundreds of thousands.

Some time before that, a similar crime was committed in England. The Churchill gang hid among the population of London, misusing the millions of citizens as a human shield. The Germans were compelled to send their Luftwaffe and reluctantly reduce the city to ruins. They called it the Blitz. This is the description that would now appear in the history books – if the Germans had won the war.

Absurd? No more than the daily descriptions in our media, which are being repeated ad nauseam: the Hamas terrorists use the inhabitants of Gaza as “hostages” and exploit the women and children as “human shields”, they leave us no alternative but to carry out massive bombardments, in which, to our deep sorrow, thousands of women, children and unarmed men are killed and injured.

IN THIS WAR, as in any modern war, propaganda plays a major role. The disparity between the forces, between the Israeli army - with its airplanes, gunships, drones, warships, artillery and tanks - and the few thousand lightly armed Hamas fighters, is one to a thousand, perhaps one to a million. In the political arena the gap between them is even wider. But in the propaganda war, the gap is almost infinite.

Almost all the Western media initially repeated the official Israeli propaganda line. They almost entirely ignored the Palestinian side of the story, not to mention the daily demonstrations of the Israeli peace camp. The rationale of the Israeli government (“The state must defend its citizens against the Qassam rockets”) has been accepted as the whole truth. The view from the other side, that the Qassams are a retaliation for the siege that starves the one and a half million inhabitants of the Gaza Strip, was not mentioned at all.

Only when the horrible scenes from Gaza started to appear on Western TV screens, did world public opinion gradually begin to change. True, Western and Israeli TV channels showed only a tiny fraction of the dreadful events that appear 24 hours every day on Aljazeera’s Arabic channel, but one picture of a dead baby in the arms of its terrified father is more powerful than a thousand elegantly constructed sentences from the Israeli army spokesman. And that is what is decisive, in the end.

War – every war – is the realm of lies. Whether called propaganda or psychological warfare, everybody accepts that it is right to lie for one’s country. Anyone who speaks the truth runs the risk of being branded a traitor.

The trouble is that propaganda is most convincing for the propagandist himself. And after you convince yourself that a lie is the truth and falsification reality, you can no longer make rational decisions.

An example of this process surrounds the most shocking atrocity of this war so far: the shelling of the UN Fakhura school in Jabaliya refugee camp. Immediately after the incident became known throughout the world, the army “revealed” that Hamas fighters had been firing mortars from near the school entrance. As proof they released an aerial photo which indeed showed the school and the mortar. But within a short time the official army liar had to admit that the photo was more than a year old. In brief: a falsification.

Later the official liar claimed that “our soldiers were shot at from inside the school”. Barely a day passed before the army had to admit to UN personnel that that was a lie, too. Nobody had shot from inside the school, no Hamas fighters were inside the school, which was full of terrified refugees.

But the admission made hardly any difference anymore. By that time, the Israeli public was completely convinced that “they shot from inside the school”, and TV announcers stated this as a simple fact.

So it went with the other atrocities. Every baby metamorphosed, in the act of dying, into a Hamas terrorist. Every bombed mosque instantly became a Hamas base, every apartment building an arms cache, every school a terror command post, every civilian government building a “symbol of Hamas rule”. Thus the Israeli army retained its purity as the “most moral army in the world”.

THE TRUTH is that the atrocities are a direct result of the war plan. This reflects the personality of Ehud Barak – a man whose way of thinking and actions are clear evidence of what is called “moral insanity”, a sociopathic disorder. The real aim (apart from gaining seats in the coming elections) is to terminate the rule of Hamas in the Gaza Strip. In the imagination of the planners, Hamas is an invader which has gained control of a foreign country. The reality is, of course, entirely different.

The Hamas movement won the majority of the votes in the eminently democratic elections that took place in the West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip. It won because the Palestinians had come to the conclusion that Fatah’s peaceful approach had gained precisely nothing from Israel - neither a freeze of the settlements, nor release of the prisoners, nor any significant steps toward ending the occupation and creating the Palestinian state. Hamas is deeply rooted in the population – not only as a resistance movement fighting the foreign occupier, like the Irgun and the Stern Group in the past – but also as a political and religious body that provides social, educational and medical services.

From the point of view of the population, the Hamas fighters are not a foreign body, but the sons of every family in the Strip and the other Palestinian regions. They do not “hide behind the population”, the population views them as their only defenders.

Therefore, the whole operation is based on erroneous assumptions. Turning life into living hell does not cause the population to rise up against Hamas, but on the contrary, it unites behind Hamas and reinforces its determination not to surrender. The population of Leningrad did not rise up against Stalin, any more than the Londoners rose up against Churchill.

He who gives the order for such a war with such methods in a densely populated area knows that it will cause dreadful slaughter of civilians. Apparently that did not touch him. Or he believed that “they will change their ways” and “it will sear their consciousness”, so that in future they will not dare to resist Israel.

A top priority for the planners was the need to minimize casualties among the soldiers, knowing that the mood of a large part of the pro-war public would change if reports of such casualties came in. That is what happened in Lebanon Wars I and II.

This consideration played an especially important role because the entire war is a part of the election campaign. Ehud Barak, who gained in the polls in the first days of the war, knew that his ratings would collapse if pictures of dead soldiers filled the TV screens.

Therefore, a new doctrine was applied: to avoid losses among our soldiers by the total destruction of everything in their path. The planners were not only ready to kill 80 Palestinians to save one Israeli soldier, as has happened, but also 800. The avoidance of casualties on our side is the overriding commandment, which is causing record numbers of civilian casualties on the other side.

That means the conscious choice of an especially cruel kind of warfare – and that has been its Achilles heel. A person without imagination, like Barak (his election slogan: “Not a Nice Guy, but a Leader”) cannot imagine how decent people around the world react to actions like the killing of whole extended families, the destruction of houses over the heads of their inhabitants, the rows of boys and girls in white shrouds ready for burial, the reports about people bleeding to death over days because ambulances are not allowed to reach them, the killing of doctors and medics on their way to save lives, the killing of UN drivers bringing in food. The pictures of the hospitals, with the dead, the dying and the injured lying together on the floor for lack of space, have shocked the world. No argument has any force next to an image of a wounded little girl lying on the floor, twisting with pain and crying out: “Mama! Mama!”

The planners thought that they could stop the world from seeing these images by forcibly preventing press coverage. The Israeli journalists, to their shame, agreed to be satisfied with the reports and photos provided by the Army Spokesman, as if they were authentic news, while they themselves remained miles away from the events. Foreign journalists were not allowed in either, until they protested and were taken for quick tours in selected and supervised groups. But in a modern war, such a sterile manufactured view cannot completely exclude all others – the cameras are inside the strip, in the middle of the hell, and cannot be controlled. Aljazeera broadcasts the pictures around the clock and reaches every home.

THE BATTLE for the TV screen is one of the decisive battles of the war.
Hundreds of millions of Arabs from Mauritania to Iraq, more than a billion Muslims from Nigeria to Indonesia see the pictures and are horrified. This has a strong impact on the war. Many of the viewers see the rulers of Egypt, Jordan and the Palestinian Authority as collaborators with Israel in carrying out these atrocities against their Palestinian brothers.
The security services of the Arab regimes are registering a dangerous ferment among the peoples. Hosny Mubarak, the most exposed Arab leader because of his closing of the Rafah crossing in the face of terrified refugees, started to pressure the decision-makers in Washington, who until that time had blocked all calls for a cease-fire. These began to understand the menace to vital American interests in the Arab world and suddenly changed their attitude – causing consternation among the complacent Israeli diplomats.

People with moral insanity cannot really understand the motives of normal people and must guess their reactions. “How many divisions has the Pope?” Stalin sneered. “How many divisions have people of conscience?” Ehud Barak may well be asking.

As it turns out, they do have some. Not numerous. Not very quick to react. Not very strong and organized. But at a certain moment, when the atrocities overflow and masses of protesters come together, that can decide a war.

THE FAILURE to grasp the nature of Hamas has caused a failure to grasp the predictable results. Not only is Israel unable to win the war, Hamas cannot lose it. Even if the Israeli army were to succeed in killing every Hamas fighter to the last man, even then Hamas would win. The Hamas fighters would be seen as the paragons of the Arab nation, the heroes of the Palestinian people, models for emulation by every youngster in the Arab world. The West Bank would fall into the hands of Hamas like a ripe fruit, Fatah would drown in a sea of contempt, the Arab regimes would be threatened with collapse.

If the war ends with Hamas still standing, bloodied but unvanquished, in face of the mighty Israeli military machine, it will look like a fantastic victory, a victory of mind over matter.
What will be seared into the consciousness of the world will be the image of Israel as a blood-stained monster, ready at any moment to commit war crimes and not prepared to abide by any moral restraints. This will have severe consequences for our long-term future, our standing in the world, our chance of achieving peace and quiet. In the end, this war is a crime against ourselves too, a crime against the State of Israel.
Uri Avnery is an Israeli writer and peace activist with Gush Shalom.

As described above - not every Israeli, just like not every American, is into the ME mess. Unfortunately, our voices are unheard and our money is not within our control. THe recetn round is mostly over, and the aftermath is grusome. Now that the press can enter the war zone, horrendious stories are surfacing. So much cost, but what was bought?

13 January 2009 – It’s a capsule of summer in southern California immersed in the winter of Norcal – but still flat. Totally flat.

Bushspeak – toward the end, he’s spilling his guts. “Strong presidency” according to his assessment. Indeed, Bush has entered a place where complete and total fuckups – clusterfucks - are described as “disappointments”. It goes on: “I don’t think you can possibly get the full breadth of an administration ’til time has passed.” That means until the short memory that typifies SPB dries up and the cocksuckers that worship anything republican rewrite history. “Full breadth” – more likely ill wind.

More on your tax dollars - A new study is estimating the US government is spending at least $52 billion a year on nuclear weapons and nuclear weapons-related programs.

16 January 2009 – Building swell meanders in today, much smaller than the hype that preceded it. Tomorrow, the swell is supposed to peak, along with crowd. I went out at Segundo Bol – long period waits and lined up in a westerly short of way. Tonight, 5 feet from 290 at 20 seconds.

17, 18 January 2009 – Fun surf at the Steps but way crowded. Stayed inside and out of the way. Surfed until dark and got a couple. Great sunset - and the water was above freezing.

19 January 2009 - Tonight I went out and rode my prized thruster - near the end of the session some amp case turned and took off in front of me right as I was making a tight first bottom turn to get down the line. The guy stuffed the nose and his board launched into the bottom of my board. After the commiserate whitewash tumble, I came up and began taking stock - I felt the impact, and sure enough the last two-thirds of my board was ripped - bad. Didn't even faze the guy.

25 January 2009 - I surf and therefore I am. A plea to the LB crowd - even if critical length has been achieved, could you guys let a couple through for the SB crew? Are you fucking unconscious? Peace, Love, and LBs. Yes, there has been surf. Up and around the Point, the surf has been head-high to overhead. The Steps has seen waist to head high surf and Tiburones has seen a couple shoulder high sets - mostly closeouts. Hot Dog claimed he hopped on the train a few times at NB. Kelp is still plaguing the line-up and sometimes its worse than the masses who never cease to turn out of the woodwork. It's either global warming or surf schools. Problem is, even the shitty insiders I habitat are getting hard to get up for. Going straight is not my idea of a fun session. Remember - just one good bottom turn makes a session.

Last Word-
Be civil to all, sociable to many, familiar with few, friend to one, enemy to none. -Benjamin Franklin, statesman, author, and inventor (1706-1790)  ¶ 8:22 PM 2 comments

 

Penguin Migrates

1, 2 January 2009 - A New Year, and yet the same old day. Why the latest ME death and destruction? - (A) Hamas-run Gaza has been largely isolated from the rest of the world since the Islamic militants won parliamentary elections in 2006. Fuel embargos, border closings, food shortages, no water, no refrigeration, partial electricity, and no freedom of movement – desperation. People willing to do stupid things to survive - no excuse, just reality for caged animals; (B) On the other side, there is fear. Terror is the fear of random death and destruction – anytime, anyone. They are doing it to each other. Since the US will not be fair in this struggle, and no other countries have the balls to stride out of the mud bog of the past, it seems as if the only finality for the whole ME shit-can is to encourage the boyz using my tax dollars – the weapons I bought them – to kill every one of those mother fuckers until they have complete submission – groveling dogs looking for food. Indian reservations. Drunks. Beaten down lack of pride purged of culture no name kill them all period. Stop drawing it out. It’s costing me way too much money. Get it over with, kill them all, kill, kill, kill, kill. On a brighter note, there is no surf.

3, 4, 5 January 2009 – Surfed the Steps and between First and Second Peak over the last three days. It was small and very cold, but what’s a surfer to do? Maybe tomorrow – right? I know I’ve said this before – but really – “U.S. Marines raised the American flag over the adobe-colored buildings, which sit on a 104-acre site and has space for 1,000 employees — more than 10 times the size of any other American Embassy in the world.” At a cost of $700 million – what’s the point? Control. “The new embassy's exact dimensions are classified, but it is said to be six times larger than the U.N. complex in New York and more than 10 times the size of the new U.S. Embassy in Beijing, which at 10 acres is America's second-largest mission.” Why is so much of my hard earned money going to fund war in the ME and embassies that dwarf the U.N.? Why not work with the U.N. here in the US and at missions throughout the world? Go it alone? Control.

Three boys take over a school by force, killing two administrators. The state police and federal officials launch a retaliatory attack. Using helicopter air power, automatic weapons, and gas, the authorities first soften up the target, striking fear into the enemy. Then they storm the building and kill the terrorists. Unfortunately, there was collateral damage. More than half of the school complex was destroyed, 30 civilians were killed, and 3 police officers were killed by friendly fire. Authorities responded to the outcome saying, “The situation was caused by the terrorists.”

When asked by the press why he thought Hamas did not renew the cease-fire, our Press Undersecretary stated: I wouldn’t know, I can’t see into the minds of terrorists. Maybe this report from the ground provides insight - "People have been weakened by 18 months of blockade and siege. They've been getting very little food, electricity or heat for a long time, and so they are in a very weakened condition." – gee – do you think the people feel a little desperate? Frustrated? Lets recall this started because the Palestinians voted Hamas into power – and the US and Israel did not approve, hence, blockade and siege. Collective punishment - you chose the wrong government. Like I said –lets end it and let the Israelis kill them all. That way, the Israelis could have their state and my taxes could go toward our needs.

Verbal dry-hump

6 through 11 January – Been all but flat, although I did try Wednesday at JTH. The water and air temperatures have matched for a cold fucking set up. I heard the beaches have had waves, but I’m a loser. Last couple days have heated up weather-wise, but the surf has remained pinner. Low tide walks and a huge full moon have helped to smooth out the NSA (no surf angst). As you could probably tell, for me the ME has solidified my feelings regarding SPB. Our congress voting to unreservedly support the Israelis, no fucking matter what, and to add icing to the proverbial cake, I heard a statement from one of the Israeli military wonders that indicated once all the rockets were taken out, there would be no more terrorists. That’s right – rockets=terrorists. Of course, like dogs, nothing in their hearts and minds; no soul; no memory – just terrorist animals. If it were so simple. I know the indiscriminate rocket fire is wrong, but I understand the frustration. At some point, most of us have felt a small measure of that frustration – like when we have no control over our situation – like how our tax dollars are used. What if the UN resolutions of the past had been implemented; like recognizing the 1967 borders and the right of return. Would things be the way they are now? Would the oppressed feel so oppressed? Would the occupiers still need to occupy? Would there have been more of a memory of healing than of hate?

Whatever you think about it, you must admit that some of the more memorable times at Sharks included the shenanigans of Penguin. From oil cans to quick wit – backside bottom turns and way to much testosterone – a love affair with the Mayor – and day to day observations: “That fly got stuck in his chest hair – like a fucking Venus Flytrap---.” Gone only to return, this time he assures he will be missing for a while. He is off with his wife to the Rocky Mountains. I’m sure he’ll feel homesick and want to experience that adrenalin rush that only a LB going straight can provide – and I will work hard to get him back this summer for a fix. Good luck no matter where you end up.

Final Word
What difference does it make to the dead, the orphans, and the homeless, whether the mad destruction is wrought under the name of totalitarianism or the holy name of liberty or democracy? -Mohandas K. Gandhi (1869-1948)  ¶ 7:32 PM 0 comments